← Search

David Mann

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 59W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Mann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-07-19 · BC-Happy Mixed Nuts-Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brendalen Hutchinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · BC-Happy Mixed Nuts-Park · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Gentry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · BC-Happy Mixed Nuts-Park · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Lowes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-08-10 · Game Set Match · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ratish Prasad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-24 · Game Set Match · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohammad Malakoutian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-18 · BC-Mann · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craighton Goeppele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-10 · BC-Mann · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-19 · BC-Mann · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Bienfang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-13 · BC-Mann · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Braun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-04-06 · BC-Mann · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Palumbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-14 · BC-Tan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thane Liffick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-01 · BC-Tan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70%
35W–15L · 56.9% of games
3.5
17.8%
8W–37L · 40.3% of games
6.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams