← Search

Kathleen Johnstone

— year-end
175 matches · 98W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Johnstone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-09-14 · PNussman (Providence Plantation) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Hoots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-10 · MEshleman (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · PNussman (Providence Plantation) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · PNussman (Providence Plantation) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · WJourdan (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Holly McClure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Griffin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
Katie O'Shea / Jennifer Johnson
2026-07-21 · HMcClure/ASmith (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Zimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Jourdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cameron Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · HMcClure/AChristie (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Jourdan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.4% of games
3.5
80%
24W–6L · 62.7% of games
4.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 47.8% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
10W–0L · 72% of games
7.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 51.5% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
4.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
18%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert