← Search

James Powell

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add James Powell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-09-01 · SClausnitzer.40C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sammy Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · SClausnitzer.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steven Clausnitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · VAurentz-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brice Englert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · VAurentz-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hutchins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · VAurentz-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · VAurentz-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brice Englert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · RHutchins-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · DBaddour-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shaun Horrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-06 · RHutchins-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-02 · RHutchins-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.1% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams