← Search

Claudine Galt

Windermere, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 20W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Claudine Galt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
Anne Balk / Elizabeth Cleary
2026-08-14 · Isleworth-Ata · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Ehrhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Isleworth-Ata · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Appleby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-22 · Lake Cane-Chapman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Sebion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · Lake Cane-Chapman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Beaulieu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · Lake Cane-Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Sebion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-06 · Lake Cane-Adcock/Chapman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Rauch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-27 · Isleworth-Castano · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Kirsch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-23 · Lake Cane-Adcock/Chapman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Sebion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-16 · Lake Cane-Adcock/Chapman · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-31 · Lake Cane-Chapman/Adcock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Sebion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-17 · Lake Cane-Chapman/Adcock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Sebion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-13 · Lake Cane-Chapman/Adcock · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 46.6% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams