← Search

Rachel Ouyang

Columbia, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 89W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Ouyang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-06-03 · Juh - New Wave · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-05-20 · Juh - New Wave · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · Juh - New Wave · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-2
W
2026-04-21 · Juh - New Wave · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-04 · Phan - Ball and Chain · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Cheung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Paige Luneburg / Kim Chamberlain
2025-10-18 · Phan - Ball and Chain · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Cheung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
L
2025-10-15 · Phan - Ball and Chain · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Becky Ronayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-06 · Phan - Ball and Chain · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susie Cheung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
28W–7L · 67.8% of games
3.5
76.9%
30W–9L · 59.2% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 26.5% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 68.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 54% of the time
#1 Singles
54%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams