← Search

Brooke Stone

Mobile, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 14W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brooke Stone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-04-20 · CCM-Arata 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-14 · CCM - Arata 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-06 · CCM-Arata 3.0 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · CCM-Arata 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · CCM-Arata 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-04 · MO - Starr/Tulowitzki · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Cooksey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Khanh Nguyen / Megan Esslinger
2026-01-07 · MO - Starr/Tulowitzki · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Laan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-19 · CCM - Starr/Tulowitzki · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fallon Gleason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-12 · CCM - Starr/Tulowitzki · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Jean Tulowitzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-29 · CCM - Starr/Tulowitzki · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Laan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-22 · CCM - Starr/Tulowitzki · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-26 · CCM - Tulowitzki/Starr · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games
3.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova