← Search

William Keunen

— year-end
65 matches · 30W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add William Keunen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-04-21 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-14 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-10 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-04 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-25 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Javier Siu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-18 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Rigl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-17 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Bayard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-11 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-10 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Freedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-03 · Malherbe (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Bayard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-28 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Battle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-26 · Rigl (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Javier Siu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.1% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 37.3% of games
8.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 55.3% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova