← Search

Melvin DeSilva

— year-end
78 matches · 16W–62L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Melvin DeSilva to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
Thomas Jakobson / Bailey Caldwell
2026-08-16 · COAC-Aces · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenneth Rotman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Paul Hewitt / Albert DiPadova
2026-08-09 · COAC-Aces · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Dzierski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
John Rasmussen / John Cantrell
2026-08-02 · COAC-Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Albert Oaten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Alain Welty / Bailey Caldwell
2026-07-21 · COAC-Aces · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Albert Oaten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · COAC-LIONS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Oaten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · COAC-LIONS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Oaten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Aronson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · COAC-LIONS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Marden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · SB LLW-LIONS-Melvin DeSliva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Gill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · COAC-LIONS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Tisdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · COAC-LIONS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · COAC-LIONS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Oaten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
16%
8W–42L · 39.6% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.7% of games
8.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova