← Search

Taylor Kim

— year-end
130 matches · 81W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Taylor Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2026-04-26 · PHX/Johnson/40&O/4.5M · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Josh Heape / David Nelson
2026-04-12 · PHX/Johnson/40&O/4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher DeRosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · PHX/Johnson/40&O/4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Gladkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-16 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-02 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-23 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-08 · PHX/JOHNSON/55&O/M9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher DeRosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-01 · PHX/JOHNSON/55&O/M9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher DeRosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-26 · 4.5 SRP SouthernEngstrom M18S · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
61.5%
64W–40L · 55.6% of games
5.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 36.5% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 62.6% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
49 matches
#2 Singles
23%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer