← Search

Joanne Kim

LA Crescenta, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Joanne Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-07-25 · SGV Flint Tri-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindi Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · LA - T-Birds · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3
W
2026-06-14 · LA - T-Birds · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · LA - T-Birds · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Lieberenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
W
2026-05-30 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Kim-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Simon Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · Besties/Carter/Burbank · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · LA - T-Birds · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#2 Singles
21%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams