← Search

Bayne Dangerfield

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 107W–85L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Bayne Dangerfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-09-03 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauri Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-29 · CTL18/Marrello/CTFC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauri Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-26 · CTL18/Marrello/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-22 · CTL18/Marrello/CTFC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-20 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Allden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fran Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · CTL18/Marrello/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diana Joyner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fran Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lissa Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · CTL18/Marrello/CTFC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · CTL40/Wilkes/SEP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
81.4%
35W–8L · 65.4% of games
3.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 63% of games
3.5
50.7%
38W–37L · 50.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 29.3% of games
6.5
21.7%
5W–18L · 41.2% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
57 matches
#1 Singles
27%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
25 matches
#2 Singles
12%
23 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer