← Search

Jeanine Christensen

Eagan, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 14W–20L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Jeanine Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-03-20 · ICT S. Anderson 10:30am · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Uri-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-18 · Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · Fred Wells Seaverson 10:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-05 · ICT S. Anderson 10:30am · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Uri-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-04 · Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am · #4 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am · #4 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-20 · Fred Wells Seaverson 10:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patoa Belgam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-02-12 · ICT S. Anderson 10:30am · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Uri-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-11 · Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am · #4 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-02-06 · Fred Wells Seaverson 10:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-05 · ICT S. Anderson 10:30am · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Uri-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-28 · Fred Wells Lunka 9:30am · #5 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 51.8% of games
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#4 Singles
15%
5 matches
#5 Singles
15%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King