Tracey Ponder
68 matches · 44W–24L · seasons 2025–2027
Captains: add Tracey Ponder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history68 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
68.5%
37W–17L · 55.7% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.