← Search

Stephanie Raper

— year-end
11 matches · 7W–4L · seasons 2019–2019

Captains: add Stephanie Raper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2019-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Gunson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kayleen Krahenbuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2019-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2019-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2019-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2019-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Joyce Barr / Nancy Ward
2019-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2019-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Sandy Hall / Carol Riley
2019-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kayleen Krahenbuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2019-02-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2019-01-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match
#2 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova