← Search

Mary Smither

— year-end
11 matches · 8W–3L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add Mary Smither to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2024-07-07 · Sandy Springs TC (Jordan Lear)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eliza Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Angie Baker / Susan Hannan
2023-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laine Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Lear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Pamela Alexander / Brooke Kremer
2023-07-12 · Sandy Springs TC (Jordan Lear)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celine Liebrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-4
W
2022-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliza Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Kim Hensarling / Shannon Tomassi
2022-01-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Lear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2021-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Lear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 7-6
W
2021-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Lear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Theresea Tipton / Karen Zimmerman
2021-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin McDevitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2020-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Lear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 6-4
W
Rachael Day / Jodi Townsend
2020-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scottie Whiteley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-1
Teams3 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.2% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova