← Search

Christina Scherwin

Westport, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 134W–74L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Christina Scherwin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
L
2026-09-11 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Harder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · MIT: Lady Bulldogs Summer: Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Lacasia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · MIT: Lady Bulldogs Summer: Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Greatsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · MIT: Lady Bulldogs Summer: Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Salam Turki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-06 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scot Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · MIL:Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Dellacroce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-09 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Harder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-18 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scot Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-12 · MIL:Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Greatsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scot Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-14 · MIT:Mixed Bulldogs:Dellacroce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scot Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Dellacroce championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 66.6% of games
4.0
63.8%
67W–38L · 53.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 54.6% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal