← Search

Mary Lowblad

Banks, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 123W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Lowblad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Docktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alena Lauritsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Leatherbarrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-15 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Kopprasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Kopprasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Leatherbarrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Maginnis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · with Judi Babcock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Judi Babcock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Judi Babcock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Judi Babcock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
79.2%
38W–10L · 60.9% of games
4.0
34.5%
10W–19L · 46.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.0mixed
79.3%
23W–6L · 64.2% of games
8.0mixed
90.5%
19W–2L · 66.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova