← Search

Dayna Moelleken

Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Dayna Moelleken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-08-16 · LA - LATC 55+ Women · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Milinda McNeely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · LA - LATC 55+ Women · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Milinda McNeely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ Su10/11:30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milinda McNeely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ Su10/11:30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milinda McNeely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ SA10 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ SA10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ SA10 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angeline Chow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-31 · LA - LATC 3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Meng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-24 · SGV Ball Busters-A. Chow-San Marino HS/ SA10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-08-15 · LA - LATC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Milinda McNeely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.4% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Singles
24%
5 matches
#2 Singles
19%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#3 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams