← Search

Emily McGuire

— year-end
53 matches · 29W–24L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Emily McGuire to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2022-02-08 · Fridley/Weber (SD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
L
2021-12-08 · STL/Blake-Cody/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Menendez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2021-11-23 · Fridley/Weber (FD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vickie Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2021-10-13 · STL/Blake-Cody/18&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Tharpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2021-10-06 · STL/Blake-Cody/18&Over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2021-09-29 · STL/Blake-Cody/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2021-09-22 · STL/Blake-Cody/18&Over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2021-07-27 · Blake/Masengill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-07-13 · Blake/Masengill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2021-07-06 · Blake/Masengill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2021-06-29 · Blake/Masengill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-06-22 · Blake/Masengill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Masengill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6, 0-1
Teams12 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
62.5%
25W–15L · 54.3% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer