← Search

Robin Welter

Tualatin, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 71W–51L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Robin Welter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-13 · SHC-Lake/Welter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Socolofsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Eargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Welter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Eargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Welter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-09 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-08 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Eargle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-20 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Stecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-13 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Patricia Eargle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-22 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 56.1% of games
3.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.3% of games
6.0
80%
12W–3L · 66.2% of games
7.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer