← Search

JEFFREY DEACON

New London, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 17W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add JEFFREY DEACON to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-03-21 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Zeller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Junius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · NPT:Deacon:Matthews · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Mountford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-04-05 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Junius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-01-11 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Al Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-04 · NPT:Deacon · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Truax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-09 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-03 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-10-26 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Junius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-19 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-10-13 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Eldredge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-05 · NPT:Junius:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Eldredge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
29%
9W–22L · 40.4% of games
7.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer