← Search

Mary Crump

— year-end
217 matches · 58W–159L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mary Crump to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-08 · 4.0 VDCR2 WoloTimm W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-03 · 3.5 CTC1 Howell W18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · 4.0 VDCR2 WoloTimm W18F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tanya Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Mountain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Blackwelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Rosenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Mountain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · 7.5 ZCTC Howell Summer WedPM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Mountain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-11-25 · 4.0 IOTC Clubb W18F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · 4.0 IOTC Clubb W18F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-04 · 4.0 IOTC Clubb W18F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games
3.5
37.4%
37W–62L · 42.6% of games
4.0
16.4%
12W–61L · 32.8% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 41.7% of games
7.5
21.4%
6W–22L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#2 Singles
19%
41 matches
#1 Singles
17%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal