← Search

Adam Strom

CHAPEL HILL, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 59W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Strom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-09-09 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Beddingfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Bland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · GGlish-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendell Gilland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Bland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Remco Laan / James White
2026-08-12 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendell Gilland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Spinarski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · GGlish-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Spinarski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · RCubrilovic-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · GGlish-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Spinarski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · RCubrilovic-CHTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · RCubrilovic-CHTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.2%
36W–33L · 53.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams