← Search

Greg Kempf

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 45W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Kempf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Ro.Elliott18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cam Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Ro.Elliott18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Whichard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Ro.Elliott18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Arick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · Ro.Elliott18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Coman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Ro.Elliott55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ronald Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Ca.Conzola55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Lauren King / Jason McGeorge
2026-07-22 · Je.Phillips40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Ca.Conzola55M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Takako Schenberger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-18 · Je.Phillips40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · ABaxley-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · ABaxley-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Je.Phillips40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.7% of games
3.5
20.5%
16W–62L · 40.2% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–7L · 44.5% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.5% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#3 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer