← Search

Craig Lair

Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 44W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Craig Lair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-06-17 · Beavers/LR/Chenal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Walls mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · Beavers/LR/Chenal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Riddle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-30 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Cogbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · Lair/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Hankins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Jerald Todd / Chuck Seel
2026-04-14 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Lair/LR/LRRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelo Volpi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Charlie Roberts / Robert Lee
2026-04-09 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelo Volpi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · Lair/LR/LRRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Cogbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-03-26 · Lair/LR/LRRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Cogbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-18 · Lair/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Ramsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · Lair/Weldon/LR/Rebs · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Cogbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 59.1% of games
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 48.2% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer