← Search

Lori Bieniek

— year-end
277 matches · 138W–139L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Bieniek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history277 matches
L
2026-06-15 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 3.MTP Snyder Sun 1 $27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-5
L
2026-06-09 · Babcock National - Intress · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-02 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 3.FV Lytle Thu 7 $25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Babcock National - Intress · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · Babcock National - Intress · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-21 · Babcock National - Intress · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-16 · Gateway - Blackmon · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-14 · Babcock National - Intress · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · Babcock National - Intress · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Mcdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-29 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 9.MTP Snyder Sun 1 $27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cicciu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Babcock National - McDonald · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-18 · Babcock National- Revis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Loramar Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams59 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.5%
23W–3L · 72.2% of games
3.5
58.2%
92W–66L · 54.5% of games
4.0
25%
6W–18L · 34% of games
6.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 43.7% of games
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 37.7% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 30.1% of games
7.0mixed
19%
4W–17L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 59% of the time
#1 Singles
59%
162 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova