← Search

Danielle Holmes

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 9W–18L · seasons 2023–2024

Captains: add Danielle Holmes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2024-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Dever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn DuRant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Avinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Felder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Carmines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaclyn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberleigh Booros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
Tara Pew / Lisa Lasko
2023-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaclyn Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Lynne Aoyama / Sarah Rogers
2023-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Avinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 26.6% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert