← Search

Stacey Campbell

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 52W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stacey Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2025-11-07 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-25 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Skrobut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · NTC-The Maude Squad-Reudink · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-09-14 · NTC-The Maude Squad-Reudink · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikhaila Reudink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-12 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betsy Hendry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-09-05 · STC-Better with Age-Dickinson/Sheppard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Czeisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-22 · Acarregui · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aime Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-19 · Acarregui · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Acarregui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-05-23 · STC-Lea · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-15 · STC-Winfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-09 · STC-Lea · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.5
50%
27W–27L · 50.6% of games
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.1% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#1 Singles
25%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
11%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe