← Search

Jessica Zimmerman

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 56W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Zimmerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-04-28 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-30 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-27 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 DAYW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-07 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-29 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 DAYW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-22 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 DAYW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-16 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-15 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 DAYW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-08 · Ellsworth/GR/3.0 DAYW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
58.6%
34W–24L · 52.6% of games
3.0
28.6%
22W–55L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
13%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova