Amanda Ivory
62 matches · 21W–41L · seasons 2019–2023
Captains: add Amanda Ivory to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history62 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Kathleen Hartnett / Hala Al-Yaqubi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Natalie Green / Rachel Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams6 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
38.3%
18W–29L · 45.6% of games
3.0
20%
3W–12L · 32.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.