← Search

Michael Fauser

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 72W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Fauser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Janine Perret championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Janine Perret championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · MI-Weekend Warriors-Perret · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janine Perret mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · MI-Weekend Warriors-Perret · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with CECI BISSONNETTE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · MI-Selby · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Seneker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · MI-Selby · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Yetman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · MI-Selby · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Seneker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Todd Seneker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Seneker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · MI-Yetman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Seneker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · MI-Yetman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 64.4% of games
3.5
57.9%
22W–16L · 55.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#1 Singles
26%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer