← Search

Juliet Mattingly

— year-end
150 matches · 91W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Juliet Mattingly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-07-30 · GEPTA/40&overMX/4.0/Bordier/EPTC#2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Herrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Jennifer Larsen / Scott Jones
2026-07-01 · GEPTA/40&overMX/4.0/Bordier/EPTC#2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Herrera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-23 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-14 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Munoz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · GEPTA/Bordier/Adult40&over/4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · GEPTA/Bordier/Adult40&over/4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · GEPTA/Bordier/Adult40&over/4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · GEPTA/Bordier/Adult40&over/4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-10-25 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Nassar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
74.1%
43W–15L · 61.4% of games
4.0
49.4%
41W–42L · 48.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova