← Search

Geoff Noyes

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 41W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Geoff Noyes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-07-08 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Talocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-27 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Talocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Talocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · MEA RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Harvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Talocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Mark Flanigan / Eric Wittkowske
2026-04-22 · MEA ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Talocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · MEA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Harvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-16 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Hamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-09 · MEA NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Sladden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
76.3%
29W–9L · 58.6% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King