← Search

Angela Boice

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
345 matches · 232W–113L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Angela Boice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history345 matches
L
2026-09-12 · LRC-Hudson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Cubanski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Cubanski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Jeanne Cubanski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Susan Boczar / Bill Taylor
2026-08-02 · TLTC-Kradjan/Kohler · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Travis Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · SWW-TLTC-Paul · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ryan Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · TLTC-Kradjan/Kohler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Travis Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · SWW-TLTC-Paul · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ryan Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Boice · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Marc Wade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Marc Wade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Marc Wade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
71.2%
37W–15L · 60.9% of games
3.5
80.2%
69W–17L · 61.7% of games
4.0
47.7%
21W–23L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
78.1%
50W–14L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.2% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
134 matches
#1 Singles
26%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
48 matches
#2 Singles
5%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer