← Search

Elizabeth Antor

Sparta, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 66W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Antor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-05-03 · MVC Wassenaar WSL M40-8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with GEORGE CHANG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · MVS Barnes WSL A40-4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-11 · MVS Barnes WSL A40-4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naoko Kobrak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-08 · MVC Wassenaar WSL M40-8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Pearson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-07 · MVS Barnes FWL A40-4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naoko Kobrak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-12-14 · MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rolan Lusaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-29 · MVS Barnes FWL A40-4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sabina Centner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-09-24 · MVS Barnes FWL A40-4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Ehrlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-14 · MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rolan Lusaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-01-27 · MVC Wassenaar FWL A55-8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Ehrlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-01-16 · MVC Wassenaar FWL A55-8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Ludden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-12 · MVC Wassenaar FWL M40-8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Tenace mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
48.6%
35W–37L · 51.4% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 56.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
18W–6L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova