← Search

Sara Feider

Milwaukee, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 108W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sara Feider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · WI Combo 7.5W GML North Shore Elite Westreich · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara van Beckum
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W GML River Glen Elite Ellegard · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Langerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML River Glen Heinrich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Underhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W GML River Glen Elite Ellegard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Lucey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML River Glen Heinrich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0W GML River Glen Elite Ellegard · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tami Vincent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML River Glen Heinrich · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W GML River Glen Heinrich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danica Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-17 · WI Combo 7.5W GML River Glen Elite Langerman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danica Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
Mary Smith / Tracy Reese
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · with Lee Heinrich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Danica Olson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 60.5% of games
3.5
72.4%
42W–16L · 59.5% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 62.5% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
9%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova