← Search

Emilee Cox

Pocatello, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 116W–43L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emilee Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Ace Holes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sydney Stradinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-27 · Ace Holes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Brake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Philip Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Nathan Richardson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Daniel Spicer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · Ace Holes · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 75.1% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.4% of games
4.0
97.1%
33W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 62.2% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.1% of games
8.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63.5% of games
9.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe