← Search

Lynde Daiek

SALINE, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lynde Daiek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-07-17 · TRAVIS-Gross 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-06-18 · TRAVIS-Gross 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · TRAVIS-Gross 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · TRAVIS- Miller 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · TRAVIS-Gross 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Min championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with SUMMER CUFF championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-17 · 4TPCC-SKOCHELAK 30NW TH 18&O SEM F6 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-15 · 6TPCC-SKOCHELAK 30NW TU 40&O SEM F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-07-01 · 6TPCC-SKOCHELAK 30NW TU 40&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-19 · 4TPCC-SKOCHELAK 30NW TH 18&O SEM F6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.5% of games
3.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 53.8% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert