← Search

CJ Gore

Newcastle, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 48W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add CJ Gore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-06-05 · Racq Pacq · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Lazarus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Paterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Paterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-12 · Racq Pacq · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Easlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Pinaroc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-07 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Racq Pacq · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Pinaroc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-11 · Racq Pacq · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Easlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-28 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Easlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-21 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Paterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-10-07 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-16 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Woodie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 53.1% of games
3.0
30.8%
32W–72L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Singles
14%
19 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal