← Search

Heath Moore

Madison, WI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 30W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heath Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-09-01 · WI Combo 6.5M MALT Bergamini · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Cusack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-11 · WI Combo 6.5M MALT Bergamini · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Montognese-Bergamini
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Taehwan Jung
2026-06-26 · #3 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-11 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5M MALT Ulrich · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chase Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-18 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5M MALT Ulrich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Finnegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-11 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5M MALT Ulrich · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chase Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-04 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5M MALT Ulrich · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chase Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-28 · WI Adult 40&O 3.5M MALT Ulrich · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games
3.5
20.4%
11W–43L · 37.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#2 Singles
15%
16 matches
#3 Singles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams