← Search

Tanya Rhodes

— year-end
252 matches · 134W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tanya Rhodes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Ojdana - Camp Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Hailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Tarver - Camp Creek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ray Schneider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · Tarver - Camp Creek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brock Halstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tania Muraro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tania Muraro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-22 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tania Muraro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tania Muraro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · Sherrod-Camp Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-09 · Salim - Rosemary · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hari Prasad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-16 · Edmonds-Camp Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Tina Phillips / Brenda Nyberg
2025-03-02 · Edmonds-Camp Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Block
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 61.4% of games
3.5
76.3%
29W–9L · 60.9% of games
4.0
53.1%
52W–46L · 53% of games
4.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 35.7% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
7.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.2% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
68 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert