← Search

Sahar Moghaddam

Fort Lauderdale, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
470 matches · 281W–189L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sahar Moghaddam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history470 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nena Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Ltc/Sahar · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Jetc/Camila · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Montoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Jetc/Camila · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Christina Devito / Samie Lesperance
2026-08-18 · Ltc/Sahar · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Lorena Villar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Lorena Villar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Broward/Kattan · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mario Becerra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Broward/Kattan · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mario Becerra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Dahdah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Ltc/Sahar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ray Hilario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · Ltc/Sahar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jesse Wolf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 56.7% of games
4.0
71.3%
127W–51L · 60.4% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 45% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
20W–20L · 54.2% of games
8.5
63%
29W–17L · 58.5% of games
9.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.8% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.3% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 53.1% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
154 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
140 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
116 matches
#1 Singles
7%
32 matches
#2 Singles
5%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe