← Search

David van Horn

Cordova, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 17W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add David van Horn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Garnett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-19 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Dooley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · Garnett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-09 · Reesman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Ivy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · Nephew/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Manshack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · Reesman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Reesman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Ivy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Nephew/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Trimble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Nathan Gray / Zach Pretzer
2026-04-12 · Nephew/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · Reesman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobby Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-02 · Reesman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobby Hoang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
David Johnson / Mark Cooper
2026-03-12 · Reesman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.9% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams