← Search

Michael Newsome

— year-end
10 matches · 6W–4L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Michael Newsome to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2023-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Armata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rich Boustead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 4-6
L
2022-12-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rich Boustead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 5-7
L
Michael Osterink / Mark Walton
2021-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2020-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 6-2
W
Kevin Murray / Mark Wagasky
2020-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Greg Foss / Carl Wolinsky
2019-12-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2019-12-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
Scott Leprohon / Jeff McConnell
2019-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Meadows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams2 teams · 2023–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 80% of the time
#1 Doubles
80%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova