← Search

Alison Schroeder

Marietta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 41W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Alison Schroeder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Coombs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · Highland Pointe (Jenna Hintz)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Jill Diasschindler / Laura Cavataio
2026-06-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Olender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Coombs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · Highland Pointe (Jenna Hintz)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Grcic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Coombs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ali Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · Harrison (Ashley Taylor)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Hintz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · Harrison (Ashley Taylor)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · Highland Pointe (Jenna Hintz)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Coombs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 6-3
W
2026-01-16 · Highland Pointe (Ashley Taylor)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Coombs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
56.9%
41W–31L · 53.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 28% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
23 matches
#2 Singles
29%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert