← Search

Gary Loeb

Eagle, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 70W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gary Loeb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
L
2026-09-01 · The Adams Family · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Koerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-20 · The Adams Family · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Koerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · The Adams Family · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Scharf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · The Adams Family · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · The Adams Family · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · Over Served 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kopplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · Over Served 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Scharf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Over Served 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kopplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-11 · Over Served · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Reneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-29 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Peterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Over Served · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Scharf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · The Incredibles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leah Hart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.6%
31W–21L · 52.4% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.7% of games
7.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.9% of games
7.0mixed
30.2%
16W–37L · 43.8% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal