← Search

Jane Connelly

Athens, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 24W–52L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jane Connelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-09-11 · BP/Bruning/Chastain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Southwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-09 · BP/Davis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-04 · BP/Bruning/Chastain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Southwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · ATC - Lill · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peng Qi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · ATC - Lill · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Dougan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · ATC - Lill · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-18 · BP/Davis/Vandiver · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen McCall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-11 · BP/Davis/Vandiver · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ellen Vandiver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-06 · BP Bruning/Chastain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Southwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-04 · BP/Davis/Vandiver · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ellen Vandiver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-02 · BP Bruning/Chastain · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Southwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · ATC/Halverson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Kulik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
41.3%
19W–27L · 46.9% of games
3.5
10%
2W–18L · 35.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 43.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe