← Search

Carmen Ekblad

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 90W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carmen Ekblad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LTFCS EKBLAD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · LTFCS EKBLAD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Salome D'Silva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · LTFCS EKBLAD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-25 · LTFCS WISNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · LTFCS WISNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaohong Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · CSRC THORNTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · LTFCS WISNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaohong Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · CSRC THORNTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Callender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · CSRC THORNTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · CSRC THORNTON · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · MEMPK LOWERY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · MEMPK JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Breedlove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.5
52.5%
32W–29L · 52.4% of games
4.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 45.1% of games
7.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 56.4% of games
8.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
19%
32 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert