← Search

Abigail Cox

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 56W–23L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Abigail Cox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-12 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK #1 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Averett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK #1 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK #1 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Francine Mazza championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Francine Mazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-3
W
2026-05-20 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Francine Mazza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · MADEIRA CANYON PARK · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
66.1%
37W–19L · 58.1% of games
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 62.4% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe