← Search

John Mulligan

— year-end
73 matches · 36W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add John Mulligan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
David Brown / Spotty Robins
2026-08-29 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dave Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Thoms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dave Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · VR Bon air - Regulagedda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minjune Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · VR Bon air - Regulagedda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · ACAC V/Kasten · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Hatcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
David Brown / Graham Rives
2026-07-25 · ACAC V/Kasten · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Hatcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · CORA - Cargiulo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-19 · ACAC V/Kasten · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eddie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · CORA - Cargiulo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · CORA - Cargiulo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Rosenstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · ACAC Davis Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.9% of games
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 24.1% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.6% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer